While both of these logo-ridden bags are ridiculously ugly, they managed not only to commit crimes against good taste...but to waste four years of the court's time in a heated copyright dispute. Louis Vuitton has maintained that the Dooney & Burke "It" bag infringed on LV's Takashi Murakami-designed Monograme Multicolore...however the court wasn't buying.
"[Louis Vuitton] offered no proof that the similarities in the marks is likely to confuse ordinary consumers, whether it is at the point of initial interest, point-of-sale, or post-sale," wrote U.S. District Court Judge Shira Scheindlin in a recent decision. "Even the testimony of Louis Vuitton's director of intellectual property suggests Louis Vuitton's infringement claim is not necessarily premised on a likelihood of confusion between its products and those of [the] defendant, but rather Louis Vuitton's distaste at being associated with the It Bags."
While LV naturally plans to appeal the decision, the judge actually came to the correct conclusion. Why? Common sense will tell you that a woman buying Dooney & Burke is most likely not (nor ever will be) a Louis Vuitton customer, so the Dooney bag would not have cost LV many lost sales. And most importantly, protecting a design from a competitor's version simply because of a close resemblance is anti-competitive.
In actual fact, the Dooney & Burke version probably helped LV by (unfortunately) spreading awareness of the Murakami design. (via WWD)
- Lesley Scott
RELATED POSTS:
↑ Grab this Headline Animator
a new $18,000 wonder from Louis Vuitton
a chic giraffe bag from Dooney & Bourke
fashiontribes.
Brazilian brand Smartbag is well-named if this model is anything to judge by. Featuring snazzy details like ruching & an oversize buckles, and thoughtful touches - a roomy interior, multiple inner pockets - it could easily become your go-to bag this season.
Available at AccessoriesStudio.com.
- Lesley Scott
↑ Grab this Headline Animator
fashiontribes.
FASHION:
Second City Style loves black, but it's so expected and grey can get drab. Why not dress like the jewel you are in shades of amethyst and emerald?
Bag Snob dishes on The Louis Vuitton Joke Bag!
Take a break from your stilettos, but don't skimp on style with Coquette's picks for the most stylish flat boots.
Music, fashion and bling! Fashion Rocks 2007 had it all. My Fashion Life examines the red carpet hits and those unfortunate misses.
Stiletto Jungle asks: Would you "Cosabella Thong" for the cure?
Papierblog looks at the dearth of models of color during fashion week and looks at racism in the industry.
Must have! Top 5 reasons Stylebites loves Nina Garcia's Little Black Book of Style
Omiru finds out: is black appropriate for a wedding (guest).
A fashion'y halloween idea from FabSugar: Uma's black bobbed, white shirted Mia Wallace from Pulp Fiction.
Bag Bliss discovers the Marc Jacobs Denim Jazz Handbag at a steal of a deal.
Kristopher digs boss Givenchy shoes that are a little bit country club, and a little bit rock n' roll.
Check out Stylehive's slideshow of our favorite one-of-a-kind handmade spats, scarflets, gloves and more for fall!
The Jewelry Welog loves the new video she spotted on Metal Chik about vintage jewelry.
BEAUTY:
Beauty Snob continues a love affair with T3- The Science of Fabulous!
The clever Beauty.com Fragrance Finder makes finding a new scent easy & fun, says Fashiontribes.
From dramatically lined eyes to fall's red lip, StyleBakery.com shows us how to achieve the look of the season in their Fall Beauty Trend Report.
Ask We Love Beauty's Ben Bennett: What are baked powders?
eBeautyDaily gives 50 beauty related uses for a tub of good old Vaseline.
LIFESTYLE:
ATTN: WebSnob Readers. Thursday, October 25th we're filming a reality show at our Punk Vs. Rockabilly Halloween Party. We're giving all WebSnobbers tickets at $10 bucks to come and rock with Fashion Indie and PMBuzz.com. Click Here for tickets.
- Lesley Scott
RELATED WEBSNOB POSTS:
WebSnob for the week of October 5, 2007
WebSnob for the week of September 28, 2007
↑ Grab this Headline Animator
fashiontribes.
"[Louis Vuitton] offered no proof that the similarities in the marks is likely to confuse ordinary consumers, whether it is at the point of initial interest, point-of-sale, or post-sale," wrote U.S. District Court Judge Shira Scheindlin in a recent decision. "Even the testimony of Louis Vuitton's director of intellectual property suggests Louis Vuitton's infringement claim is not necessarily premised on a likelihood of confusion between its products and those of [the] defendant, but rather Louis Vuitton's distaste at being associated with the It Bags." 
While LV naturally plans to appeal the decision, the judge actually came to the correct conclusion. Why? Common sense will tell you that a woman buying Dooney & Burke is most likely not (nor ever will be) a Louis Vuitton customer, so the Dooney bag would not have cost LV many lost sales. And most importantly, protecting a design from a competitor's version simply because of a close resemblance is anti-competitive. 
a new $18,000 wonder from Louis Vuitton
a chic giraffe bag from Dooney & Bourke
